As predicted, the establishment, politicians & media are mulling over the possible 'solutions' posed by LIVE EARTH, inspiring thousands to go green, like the solution was ever in doubt .
There's been talk of how we must take action, how we simply have to do something right now, or else the time will be up and all that we hold dear will be lost in the balance.
As evidenced in this article from the Scotsman, be prepared to dramatic changes in your lifestyle
"MEAT-FREE menus, battery- operated cars and an end to affordable flights.
These are among the radical visions outlined in a report which says Britain could be carbon neutral within 20 years - but only if major steps are taken to change our lifestyles.
Paul Allen, CAT's development director, said: "What we are saying is that we need a huge programme, a bit like the US space project in the Sixties.
"When that was launched it was known to be a huge target, but the driving force to make it work was there. We think that zerocarbonbritain can do that again - it can give us a positive future.
In its report, the CAT suggests creating a market for carbon that affects every individual, household and company in the country. People would be given their own carbon credits called Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) and carry them on smart cards
More of the fallout is backed by Democratic US representative John Dingell, calling for an all out Carbon Tax
His proposal would boost the federal gasoline tax by 50 cents a gallon, he said, and establish a "double digit" tax on each ton of carbon dioxide emissions. The federal tax on a gallon of gas is now 18.4 cents and has not risen in 14 years.
His remarks coincided with the weekend of Live Earth, a series of concerts around the world aimed at raising awareness of climate change. The concerts are backed by former Vice President Al Gore, a proponent of a carbon-based tax.
The consensus at this point seems destined that we will have to accept taxation on everything we do for the 'good of the planet', which is very well illustrated in this Toronto Star Editorial
"Canada must put a price on carbon if this country is serious about meeting its medium- and long-term goals for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions. The round table members say Canadians will not do what has to be done as long as we act as if there is no cost to pumping carbon into the atmosphere."
Whether it takes the form of a carbon tax or a market price determined through a system in which emissions are capped and those below their caps sell their unused emissions allotment to those who exceed their caps, the round table members say paying for the environmental damage we do is the surest way of getting us all to stop.
And the message to government couldn't be clearer. The sooner it acknowledges that we all must pay for the environmental damage we are doing by putting a price on carbon that leads to real reductions over the medium term, the better off we will be over the longer term in terms of both environmental and economic effects. "
This just falls hand in hand with another Canadian Report on how all Canadians must pay a heavy toll or face future economic disaster due to carbon emissions.
The burden is put on the backs of the working men & women, like we're the plague that's devastating the planet, all the while the major polluters are grandstanding with their bought and sold government, gleefully smacking their lips at the prospect that people have 'gone along' with the global tax.
God forbid a volcano erupts, we'd all be back at square zero, and just in case anyone is wondering, volcano eruptions will put a 100-150 million tons of man-made carbon into the atmosphere.
I want to ask people one thing. If the planet was in such peril, four strokes to midnight as the media is having us believe, why is it that HEMP isn't being viewed as any viable solution to the problem?
If man-made global warming is real, which it isn't, and if carbon emissions are so detrimental to the planet, how come we don't fully invest in a plant that could fuel our cars, cook our meals, whose fibers are one of the world's most durable?
| Top Global Warming Advocate: Jupiter & Saturn Closer To Sun Than Earth Live Earth kingpin dismantles his own credibility on national radio as propaganda bandwagon is massive flop |
| Paul Joseph Watson | |
Live Earth's half empty stadiums and lackluster TV viewing figures were preceded by another embarrassment after one of the propaganda bandwagon's kingpins and a top global warming advocate responded to a question about solar-system wide climate change by claiming that Jupiter, Mars and Saturn were closer to the sun than Earth.
David Mayer de Rothschild is the youngest child (born 1978) of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, of the British wing of the Rothschild banking family.
Rothschild's recent book, 77 Essential Skills to Stop Climate Changes, calls for ordinary people to limit outward behavior and even work at home and was used as part of the PR blitz to accompany the Live Earth project.
Appearing on The Alex Jones Show this past Friday, Rothschild reacted to a point about massive climate change at every point of the solar system and its relation to natural sun cycles by claiming Mars, Saturn and Jupiter were closer to the sun than Earth!
Here's a brief transcript of the exchange.
ALEX JONES: "The polar icecaps of Mars are receding at several miles a year, much faster than ours and that the moons of Saturn and Jupiter are melting, in fact several of their moons were ice and are now liquid seas - how are SUV's causing that David Rothschild?
ROTHSCHILD: "Because those planets are closer to the sun, my friend."
ALEX JONES: "No, Jupiter and Saturn are not closer to the sun and neither is Mars."
Rothschild then quickly changes the subject and when the point is raised again later in the show, he makes no effort to correct himself.
Click here for the clip. Listen to the full MP3 of the interview by clicking here.
Last time we checked, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were all orbiting the sun at a greater distance than Earth.
Rothschild's hilarious screw-up is yet another example as to why the general public remain unconvinced by the error-strewn apocalyptic admonitions of the climate cult.
A Mori poll released last week found that a majority of the UK population were still skeptical about man-made global warming and believed the threats were being exaggerated for political purposes and to make money.
Throughout the radio appearance, Rothschild parrots empty sound bite platitudes about there only being "one earth," while failing to address recent scientific analysis which reveals that the oldest plant DNA ever discovered showed that "the planet was far warmer hundreds of thousands of years ago than is generally believed," again underscoring the fact that climate change is a routine and natural phenomenon that has occurred throughout earth's history.
Although Rothschild stresses the existence of just one earth on numerous occasions, it appears as though he thinks there is another one earth orbiting the sun - at a greater distance than Saturn or Jupiter!
He also glibly repeats the charge that the radio station he was appearing on, the Genesis Communications Network, was bankrolled by the oil industry and that was the reason for challenging the monopoly on truth that the man-made global warming crowd attribute themselves.
Deliciously ironic therefore it is that big oil men like the chairman of British Petroleum Peter Sutherland are fanning the flames of global warming hysteria in order to create artificial scarcity and drive up prices, while also getting fat off the peak oil scam, another charade manufactured by the oil companies and gleefully embraced by phony environmentalists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv. Get access to hundreds of special video reports, audio interviews, books and documentary films. Subscribers also get instant access to our hugely popular forum where you can network with like-minded people, meet up and get active! Click here to subscribe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Lord Guthrie, director of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, also recently called for the elite to, "Address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide," (global government).
In addition, it was the Rothschild family itself that helped fund the Rockefellers to create the first giant trusts and oil monopolies in the late 19th century.
Every time a public figure or scientist dares to question the global warming orthodoxy, they are savaged as being in bed with oil companies and yet it is the oil company chieftains that are pushing climate change harder than anyone.
Madonna, owner of 6 evil gas-guzzling cars and producer of 440 tonnes of CO2 during her Confessions tour, performs at Live Earth in London.
Rothschild's red-faced gaffe was allied with an embarrassingly lukewarm response to this weekend's Live Earth propaganda extravaganza, at which we saw hypocritical pop stars perform to half-empty stadiums around the world.
The television audience also fell way below expectations and the event was branded a "foul-mouthed flop" by newspapers. Just hundreds turned up to one of the events held in Washington at which Al Gore appeared.
"Organisers of the global music concert - punctuated by swearing from presenters and performers - had predicted massive viewing figures," reports the Daily Mail.
"But BBC's live afternoon television coverage attracted an average British audience of just 900,000. And the peak audience, which came when Madonna sang at Wembley, was a dismal 4.5million. Three times as many viewers saw the Princess Diana tribute on the same channel six days before."
"Two years ago, Live 8 drew a peak television audience of 9.6million while Live Aid notched 10million in 1985."
As more jet-flying celebrity hypocrites lecture us on changing our lifestyle and as more "experts" fail to get even the most basic facts correct, expect more acolytes to desert the cause and for global warming to be consigned to the dustbin of scientific theory, just as the "global cooling" scare of the 70's quickly evaporated under widespread ridicule.
Nuk ka komente:
Posto një koment