WANT TO SAVE AMERICA??
DO NOT VOTE
For The Candidates On This List.
They want to DESTROY America and Create
"The North American Union."
The following list of presidential candidates are member's of
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR):
---------------
DEMOCRATS
---------------
Hilary Clinton
Barack Obama
Joe Biden
Chris Dodd
John Edwards
Bill Richardson
------------------
REPUBLICANS
------------------
Fred Thompson
Rudy Guiliani
Mitt Romney
John McCain
Jim Gilmore
Newt Gingrich
THEIR GOAL?
To REMOVE American Borders
AND
TRADE America's sovereignty for U.N. CONTROL.
They are also for the AMERO, Federal ID CARD,and RFID CHIPS.
They seek to JOIN
America, Mexico, and Canada
INTO ONE COUNTRY BY 2010.
Sovereignty and globalisation
http://www.cfr.org/publication/9903/sovereignty_and_globalisation.html
Author:
Richard N. Haass, President
February 17, 2006
Project Syndicate
The world's 190-plus states now co-exist with a larger number of powerful non-sovereign and at least partly (and often largely) independent actors, ranging from corporations to non-government organisations (NGOs), from terrorist groups to drug cartels, from regional and global institutions to banks and private equity funds. The sovereign state is influenced by them (for better and for worse) as much as it is able to influence them. The near monopoly of power once enjoyed by sovereign entities is being eroded.
As a result, new mechanisms are needed for regional and global governance that include actors other than states. This is not to argue that Microsoft, Amnesty International, or Goldman Sachs be given seats in the United Nations General Assembly, but it does mean including representatives of such organisations in regional and global deliberations when they have the capacity to affect whether and how regional and global challenges are met.
Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function.
This is already taking place in the trade realm. Governments agree to accept the rulings of the World Trade Organisation because on balance they benefit from an international trading order, even if a particular decision requires that they alter a practice that is their sovereign right to carry out.
Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change. Under one such arrangement, the Kyoto Protocol, which runs through 2012, signatories agree to cap specific emissions. What is needed now is a successor arrangement in which a larger number of governments, including the United States, China and India, accept emission limits or adopt common standards because they recognise that they would be worse off if no country did.
All of this suggests that sovereignty must be redefined if states are to cope with globalisation.
At its core, globalisation entails the increasing volume, velocity and importance of flows within and across borders of people, ideas, greenhouse gases, goods, dollars, drugs, viruses, emails, weapons, and a good deal else, challenging one of sovereignty's fundamental principles: the ability to control what crosses borders in either direction. Sovereign states increasingly measure their vulnerability not to one another, but to forces beyond their control.
Globalisation thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere.
Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary.
Rudy Giuliani Benefits From Sale Of U.S. Highways To Foreign Companies
Hillary Clinton "Internationalism" IS Essential In The Service Of American interests".
Barack Obama CoSponsors S. 237 which PROTECTS illegal aliens from Prosecution for Social Security Fraud..
Fred Thompson's Globalist Pedigree
Joseph R. Biden "On the Threshold of the New World Order"
Nuk ka komente:
Posto një koment